Subject of the online argument I've selected: Does Anyone Else Scientifically Think About Ghosts?
Why did you choose this online argument for your assignment?
I chose this online argument for my assignment because I am an avid ghost hunter and have been for most of my life. I also love science, studying science, and seek out to have legitimate experiences. The paranormal investigation methods I agree with and follow are to debunk first and foremost, critically analyze, and eliminate causes such as cars going by or someone talking outside caught on cameras or recorders for example. Theories of what ghosts are and if we can measure them are an intriguing pursuit, and its fun to see how people debate this topic.
As a supporter of science, it would be great to one day see a scientific study of if the supernatural is more natural than we think. Perhaps ghost are not what we have seen in our culture, or maybe they are, or it's a mix. Phantom mists captured on photos are usually moisture in the air, our minds look for faces in things (pareidolia), and strange moving lights can be bugs. On the flip side, can us as humans pick up on past feelings in a certain location, hear sounds of residual energy such as footsteps when no one is there, or can we hear disembodied voices? Does something cause this or could it be people who have passed on in another form?
Old photos I took at The Crescent Hotel in Eureka Springs, Arkansas. In one photo it seems like there is a mist, then in the next photo taken a couple of seconds later, has no mist.
An old photo of me with something in the background. All that was behind me was a brick wall. What do you see?
Other examples of pareidolia.
Provide three negative examples and concerns you have with this online argument.
Here are quotes taken from the Reddit threat.
1. "Off topic but if I ever see a home priced at significantly below market value I should ask if any baggage comes along with the purchase."
2. "Stop waiting for science. They turn their information over to the military and use it against you."
3. "My problem here is how people exaggerate."
I'm concerned with 1 because it's a little off topic and the word baggage seems reductive. With 2, their response seems biased and assumptive. I've talked to many scientists and they say they support sharing knowledge with all and science is for everyone. With 3, seems judgmental and dismissive.
Create five rules for how people should argue online more constructively.
1. Don't be dismissive and judgmental of others.
2. Research both sides of the argument.
3. Listen to others opinions with respect.
4. Always try to be open minded.
5. Be kind even if you don't agree with someone.
Link to the Reddit post:
No comments:
Post a Comment